Watching Question Time on the Beeb tonight has made my blood boil. Labour are persuing the attack on the Tories, accusing them of seeking to fracture the Union between England and Scotland.
What a cheek this is coming from a party that has done so much terrible damage to this 300 year historic marriage between these two proud nations. Labour forced the Scottish Parliament onto the Union, without calling for a referendum on the issue with every member of the UK (as they, constitutionally, should really have done). The Scottish Parliament has forged an unprecedented increase in the flames of Scottish nationalism. The Scots now have a sniff of self governance (something which English voters have not had) and now they want more.
North of the border the SNP have latched onto this in the sort of opportunistic way one would expect of a bunch of power hungry socialists. The Scottish Parliament has taxed and spent in such a profligate way that there has been an enormous 'brain drain' down south to England which has the unavoidable consequence of leaving the dumb, intellectually-light half breed remaining. These idiots have no recognition of how bad independence would be, but seem to believe that just because Mel Gibson painted the Saltaire on his face and slit a few extras throats (artistically, of course) in a Hollywood movie then Scotland should listen to the nationalists who are, rhetorically, doing pretty much the same.
Labour have crucified the Union over the last 10 years. Scottish devolution has failed miserably because English taxpayers are massively subsidising the Scots! Look at the Scottish Parliament costs themselves!! Ten times more expensive than originally budgeted for. Look at the resentment of English voters at the scandal of Scottish MPs being able vote on English matters, but English MPs not having any say in the Scottish Parliament!
No, Labour do not have any moral right to throw their weight, and accusations, around with their horrendous record of damage done to this proud nation.
Thursday, January 18, 2007
Big Brother - Who the fuck cares?
I give less attention to Big Brother than I do to the turds flushing down my toilet. BB is the most pathetic excuse of a reality programme I have ever had the misfortune to suffer watching. What a shame that so many people are buying into what they read in trashy newspapers about racism directed towards an Indian actress.
Surely there are far greater news issues occupying peoples thoughts than some fat slapper trying to be clever taking the piss out of someone she is jealous about being extremely better looking than her? What about inflation soaring, or criminals escaping from prisons, or soldiers being killed in Iraq?? Why on earth are we looking at our news-stands choc full of headlines dominated by Big Brother, when so much else is happening in the world?
Could it be that in another week of dreadful news, both at home and abroad, the Labour Party are wanting to shift the debate and dump the bad news from front pages to avoid continuing the obvious embarrassment this dispicable government is going through?
Surely there are far greater news issues occupying peoples thoughts than some fat slapper trying to be clever taking the piss out of someone she is jealous about being extremely better looking than her? What about inflation soaring, or criminals escaping from prisons, or soldiers being killed in Iraq?? Why on earth are we looking at our news-stands choc full of headlines dominated by Big Brother, when so much else is happening in the world?
Could it be that in another week of dreadful news, both at home and abroad, the Labour Party are wanting to shift the debate and dump the bad news from front pages to avoid continuing the obvious embarrassment this dispicable government is going through?
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
Happy 65th 'Muhammad'
Today I would like to wish Muhammad Ali a happy 65th Birthday, how ever I think this mans tale has messages for all of us today. 'I am the greatest' claims Muhammad Ali, undoubtedly he was a very good boxer, but as Jesus our lord, and the real last prophet said, 'Blessed are the meek', Meek Ali is not, neither is he blessed. Due to his turning to the foul prophet if islam, away from the love of God, and his constant jibing of the Christians has meant that this once great fighter has been struck down with the Shaking Disease which ironically enough means that while he continues to think of himself as the greatest, even a non boxer could now kick his ass in the ring, oh how the mighty have fallen I thought to my self, and there is no greater fall than the fall that pride (one of the 7 deadly sins) can induce. As the muslims say, الله أكبر الحمد لله
'Praise be to allah, allah is great.' Well the real God is indeed great and just, unlike this pagan sand deity 'allah', and has once again proven his power over all men, muslims and liberals reading this, you have been warned!!!
While I was talking this matter over with a friend he was concerned that I was using his muslim name of 'Muhammad Ali' instead of honoring the name his parents gave him, while this may be another attack if his ego I have decided to refer to him as 'Muhammad', this is a rule that I will apply to all 'muhammidan' converts.
While I'm always careful to separate religion from culture, indeed I am a fan of Arab culture and there are over 25 million Arab Christians (most living in South America, but the terrible reasons for this will be the subject of another blog at a later date). I think that it is important that if you are going to turn away from God and to embrace the anti-Christ then you should mark your self as such by taking its name, this will also aid the CIA when they do terrorist checks on plane passengers and warn others to ignore what ever these mad men have to say. So even though these 'Al Muaallafun kulubuhum' or Islamic converts, in their attempts to annoy us and cause hurt to their families and friends are actually doing us a favor.
In a similar way I believe that if a person decides to abandon the sand deity and its false witness and embrace the Lord Jesus then they should take up a Latin name, for their own safety and to distance them selves from the heinous and wicked acts of their former compatriots. However as I’m not an Islamic fascist I would not choose to force them to do this. Although it is rare to find converts to the right path offered by Jesus, if we do find them its always in little pieces stuffed in to suit cases and abandoned on Yorkshire's moors, as is the deadly price of turning away from 'the allah'.
Tuesday, January 16, 2007
Inflation going through the roof
Today has surelty smashed the illusion that Labour are compentent with the economy. The Consumer Price Index, which is the government's prefered measure of inflation, has registered another increase; it now stands at 3%. This is well above the 2% target set by Gordon Brown, but this only tells half the story.
The Retail Price Index, which everyone else really measures inflation, is up to a whopping 4.4%, the highest in 15 years. Why is it that we are given the 3% figure by the government instead of the 4.4%? Well, Gordon Brown shifted the focus about 3 years ago to convert the headline inflation to CPI rather than the naturally higher RPI. Undoubtedly this was done so the silly inference of having a continually lower rate could be retained.
Fiddling the figures is something Labour do very well; crime stats are regularly manipulated. However when the economy is suffering so badly I would hope people could see through the spin and realise that Gordon Brown is not the economic genius he is portrayed as being.
The Retail Price Index, which everyone else really measures inflation, is up to a whopping 4.4%, the highest in 15 years. Why is it that we are given the 3% figure by the government instead of the 4.4%? Well, Gordon Brown shifted the focus about 3 years ago to convert the headline inflation to CPI rather than the naturally higher RPI. Undoubtedly this was done so the silly inference of having a continually lower rate could be retained.
Fiddling the figures is something Labour do very well; crime stats are regularly manipulated. However when the economy is suffering so badly I would hope people could see through the spin and realise that Gordon Brown is not the economic genius he is portrayed as being.
Monday, January 15, 2007
Islam Is A Joke!
What a joke the religion of Islam is! I read on the BBC News website today how a court in Casablanca, Morocco have given 'their own' journalists suspended sentences and a fine for defaming Islam and breaching public morality. This occured when the journalists Driss Ksikes and Sanaa al-Aji published an article in journalists' weekly magazine Nichane, entitled 'How Moroccans laugh at religion, sex and politics'.
The journalists argue that the jokes are in common usage however the court still banned the publication of the magazine for two months and fined the journalists $8,000 (£4,000). Even though this case is pure lunacy I can't help but wonder what would happen if these journalists were Westerners, they probably would have fatwas issued against them or be beheaded.
Anyway this court case is just another example how Islam tries to restrict free speech and shows what a joke this sand religion really is.
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6262919.stm
The journalists argue that the jokes are in common usage however the court still banned the publication of the magazine for two months and fined the journalists $8,000 (£4,000). Even though this case is pure lunacy I can't help but wonder what would happen if these journalists were Westerners, they probably would have fatwas issued against them or be beheaded.
Anyway this court case is just another example how Islam tries to restrict free speech and shows what a joke this sand religion really is.
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6262919.stm
Sunday, January 14, 2007
More shifting the blame
Labour never seem to be able to take responsibility for their own actions, do they? So often we see them try to finger other people, usually unelected, for their own misdemeanours. Look at some prior examples; Dr David Kelly committed suicide after being blamed for the dodgy dossier, Martin Sixsmith was forced out after the government leaked an email of his to bury some bad news and who can forget the disgraceful way Labour tried to smear 94-year old Rose Addis as being a racist when the media published stories of how poorly she was treated by the NHS?
They are at it again. Instead of copping the flak for making such a fucking shambles of the current scandal surrounding Briton's foreign criminal records not being updated the Home Office, through their ministers, have stitched up the non-elected bureaucrats. It doesn't seem to matter that ministers knew about this debacle through being briefed by the police, they just will not take responsibility for the mess.
So it doesn't surprise me one little bit that the mandarins in the Home Office are shouldering the flak. It emerges today that a senior civil servant has been suspended following an 'internal inquiry'. Yeh right, pull the other one! It is obvious what has happened. John Reid, the disgraceful excuse for a Home Secretary, has looked at who had access to the briefing notes and found the only non-political name on the list.
Such disreputable behaviour is now becoming a cancer in politics. It is no wonder that people don't want to vote in elections any more when they see such horrendous dereliction of duty and responsibility.
They are at it again. Instead of copping the flak for making such a fucking shambles of the current scandal surrounding Briton's foreign criminal records not being updated the Home Office, through their ministers, have stitched up the non-elected bureaucrats. It doesn't seem to matter that ministers knew about this debacle through being briefed by the police, they just will not take responsibility for the mess.
So it doesn't surprise me one little bit that the mandarins in the Home Office are shouldering the flak. It emerges today that a senior civil servant has been suspended following an 'internal inquiry'. Yeh right, pull the other one! It is obvious what has happened. John Reid, the disgraceful excuse for a Home Secretary, has looked at who had access to the briefing notes and found the only non-political name on the list.
Such disreputable behaviour is now becoming a cancer in politics. It is no wonder that people don't want to vote in elections any more when they see such horrendous dereliction of duty and responsibility.
Saturday, January 13, 2007
Stop Apologising To The Muslims
I read on the BBC website today that Germany’s interior minister Wolfgang Schaeuble has called for an EU-wide dialogue with Muslims in an effort to integrate them better. Mr Schaeuble has compared parts of the Islamic world to pre-Enlightenment Europe, and criticised both the burka veil and traditional Muslim attitudes to women, which is fair enough.
But what I take issue with is what he said next "We should not be arrogant but only helpful. After all, Christianity waged terrible conflicts for a few centuries until the process of Enlightenment took root". CHRISTIANITY WAGED TERRIBLE CONFLICTS?? There is no doubt that he was referring to the Crusades but Mr Schaeuble makes it sound as if it was Christianity’s fault for the Crusades.
Don’t get me wrong Mr Schaeuble is a hero. He was one of the few German politicians to support the United States liberation of Iraq. However my gripe (which is clear to see in what he said) is how we in the West feel it is necessary to apologise for the Crusades or see our current struggles with the Muslims as Christianity’s fault. Let’s get one thing clear, the Crusades was a war of self defence against the Muslim aggressors.
However despite this, the culture of apologising to the Muslims, for which the politically correct left are to blame, still continues today. Just look at the 7/7 bombings in London. Instead of people (especially on the left) saying ‘damn these filthy Muslims worshiping their fictitious sand god and heaping misery on the entire world’ they instead say ‘oh poor Muslims, they are acting like this because of Iraq’.
What these people forget is that the Iraqi liberation is a direct result of the terrorist attack on New York on September 11th 2001. However people forget this and the reason for this is because the West is losing the propaganda war to the Muslims. There are two reasons for this; the first is that the Muslims have the ability to act like the victims of a conflict even if they themselves started the conflict and the second reason is that the liberal media in the West are reinforcing the Muslims position as victims instead of telling the truth and supporting our troops.
But what I take issue with is what he said next "We should not be arrogant but only helpful. After all, Christianity waged terrible conflicts for a few centuries until the process of Enlightenment took root". CHRISTIANITY WAGED TERRIBLE CONFLICTS?? There is no doubt that he was referring to the Crusades but Mr Schaeuble makes it sound as if it was Christianity’s fault for the Crusades.
Don’t get me wrong Mr Schaeuble is a hero. He was one of the few German politicians to support the United States liberation of Iraq. However my gripe (which is clear to see in what he said) is how we in the West feel it is necessary to apologise for the Crusades or see our current struggles with the Muslims as Christianity’s fault. Let’s get one thing clear, the Crusades was a war of self defence against the Muslim aggressors.
However despite this, the culture of apologising to the Muslims, for which the politically correct left are to blame, still continues today. Just look at the 7/7 bombings in London. Instead of people (especially on the left) saying ‘damn these filthy Muslims worshiping their fictitious sand god and heaping misery on the entire world’ they instead say ‘oh poor Muslims, they are acting like this because of Iraq’.
What these people forget is that the Iraqi liberation is a direct result of the terrorist attack on New York on September 11th 2001. However people forget this and the reason for this is because the West is losing the propaganda war to the Muslims. There are two reasons for this; the first is that the Muslims have the ability to act like the victims of a conflict even if they themselves started the conflict and the second reason is that the liberal media in the West are reinforcing the Muslims position as victims instead of telling the truth and supporting our troops.
Friday, January 12, 2007
More troops in Iraq
I am going to go against the grain of public opinion, and that of the Conservative Party, by totally endorsing what President Bush is proposing to do in Iraq. By sending in an extra 21,000 troops to secure Baghdad Mr Bush is sending out a clear signal to those wishing to prolong the insurgency there. He is declaring his hand with force and confidence.
For those who believe 21,000 is not enough it should be noted that the caveat secured by the President was for Iraqi forces to support US troops to the tune of over 35,000 men. I honestly believe that an immediate and determined deployment of an extra 56,000 troops should secure the Iraqi capital. What is needed, however, is a major rethinking of what is needed to radically alter the cycle of violence and killings.
My view is that the US should move into Sadr City as soon as they can to deal with Moqtada al Sadr. This egotistical cleric, who has such a big head he named an entire district of Baghdad after him, needs to be taught a lesson. His slums are populated by radicalised Shia militia who have nothing to lose by sniping dead innocent residents in the Iraqi capital. They represent a stumbling block to peace and should be taken on.
This is undoubtedly make or break for President Bush. If this gamble works he will be hailed as the ultimate 'Comeback Kid' president by turning around his popular fortunes. If it fails things could get unbelievably ugly both in Iraq and for the Republicans in America.
For those who believe 21,000 is not enough it should be noted that the caveat secured by the President was for Iraqi forces to support US troops to the tune of over 35,000 men. I honestly believe that an immediate and determined deployment of an extra 56,000 troops should secure the Iraqi capital. What is needed, however, is a major rethinking of what is needed to radically alter the cycle of violence and killings.
My view is that the US should move into Sadr City as soon as they can to deal with Moqtada al Sadr. This egotistical cleric, who has such a big head he named an entire district of Baghdad after him, needs to be taught a lesson. His slums are populated by radicalised Shia militia who have nothing to lose by sniping dead innocent residents in the Iraqi capital. They represent a stumbling block to peace and should be taken on.
This is undoubtedly make or break for President Bush. If this gamble works he will be hailed as the ultimate 'Comeback Kid' president by turning around his popular fortunes. If it fails things could get unbelievably ugly both in Iraq and for the Republicans in America.
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
Just how bad can it get at the Home Office?
Today has been dominated by two fairly major scandals eminating from the Home Office. The first is the news that two rather dangerous (and morbidly obese) murderers have escaped from a prison supposedly categorised as being 'excellent'. This comes a couple of days after a prisoner was freed by masked assailants from a police 'security' wagon as he was transported to hospital.
What a shambles. It puts the old days of Group 4 escapes into the shadows.
The second shocking scandal to befall this shambolic excuse for a government department is todays revelation that ministers knew about the hundreds of Britons who committed crimes abroad. These rapists, paedophiles and assorted other miscreants have been permitted to work in this country. They might be working with patients, kids, vulnerable people - we just don't know! What a dreadful scandal; but should we be surprised that it is happening? I'm not.
John Reid is perhaps one of the most inept cabinet minister Labour have. I am astonished that he gets all the big jobs. At health he left a system where health trusts were teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. When he was defence secretary our troops in Iraq had no decent boots, radios or even guns! At Northern Ireland he was forced to dissolve the Stormont parliament because he couldn't keep control there and his other major position, as Labour chairman, was marked by the increasingly bitter feuding between numbers 10 and 11 Downing Street.
Not exactly a sparkling reputation. Yet this man is charged with protecting the public from dangerous criminals. Thankfully one of our better performers, David Davis, is tearing lumps out of the Labour front bench. What's the betting, however, that no resignations result from this?
What a shambles. It puts the old days of Group 4 escapes into the shadows.
The second shocking scandal to befall this shambolic excuse for a government department is todays revelation that ministers knew about the hundreds of Britons who committed crimes abroad. These rapists, paedophiles and assorted other miscreants have been permitted to work in this country. They might be working with patients, kids, vulnerable people - we just don't know! What a dreadful scandal; but should we be surprised that it is happening? I'm not.
John Reid is perhaps one of the most inept cabinet minister Labour have. I am astonished that he gets all the big jobs. At health he left a system where health trusts were teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. When he was defence secretary our troops in Iraq had no decent boots, radios or even guns! At Northern Ireland he was forced to dissolve the Stormont parliament because he couldn't keep control there and his other major position, as Labour chairman, was marked by the increasingly bitter feuding between numbers 10 and 11 Downing Street.
Not exactly a sparkling reputation. Yet this man is charged with protecting the public from dangerous criminals. Thankfully one of our better performers, David Davis, is tearing lumps out of the Labour front bench. What's the betting, however, that no resignations result from this?
Gruesome Saddam post-death footage
Yes this is one of the more tasteless postings I have blogged, but I thought you should see yet another example of how utterly barbaric these Arabs are in Iraq. Not content with seeing Hussain almost snapped in two (which he didn't deserve; the death should have been far slower and painful) these chattering necro-enthusiasts actually found a way into the morgue to video the dead dictator on his cold slab.
The film is a little macabre, so don't watch it whilst eating. Also, that red thing under his chin ain't a rose, it's the inside of his throat.
Dead man Saddam
The film is a little macabre, so don't watch it whilst eating. Also, that red thing under his chin ain't a rose, it's the inside of his throat.
Dead man Saddam
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
Hammersmith and Fulham: Glorious!
This is what I mean by how a Conservative administration should behave. Elected one year, reducing taxes for hard working people the next.
Classic!
Well done guys.
Classic!
Well done guys.
More on Ruth Kelly
Finally some tangible opposition to the rank hypocrisy of Ruth Kelly. Sadly this slating hasn't come from the elected politicians we would expect to be on hand to expose such double standards, it has been through the pages of national newspapers.
ConservativeHome is reporting that The Sun, through it's leader, has criticised Kelly's decision to send her child to a fee paying private school for special kids. They slam her, accusing the former Education Secretary as being a "fully fledged, ocean-going, two-faced hypocrite". Reading this on ConservativeHome was a little bit of a relief, because it finally presented me with the opportunity to see some form of Conservative outlet articulating my views.
David Cameron has distanced himself from the criticism, doubtless attempting to position himself as being warm, cuddly and representative of those who just want to do the best for their kids. It appears DC has temporarily taken leave of understanding just who he is. I am a small league politician (a local councillor) so I am totally at liberty to play the caring sharing card. I can see what Ruth Kelly's motivations are, but the simple fact of the matter is that she is part of a government that has led a concerted attack on anything outside state-funded education. They abolished the Assisted Places Scheme (which gave parents from all backgrounds the opportunity to send their kids to places like where Kelly has sent hers, without having to mortgage the house to afford the £15k a year fees) and worked tirelessly to find new ways of taxing us so they can pump billions into the State system. Mr Cameron is the leader of the opposition. He should be standing up to the government and exposing this hypocrisy, just as I would criticise my local council if they spent money on something that they had worked so hard to denigrate. It is his job!
Back to the core issue: What has all this money got us in this country? Well the cash soaked education sector is still unable to be trusted by Ms Kelly, a tantamount admission of utter failure by her government to deliver decent standards. The same is true of the NHS.
I just wish our national politicians had the guts to expose this. I desperately hope Cameron can start scoring some goals with the total shambles emanating from this government on an almost weekly basis. In my view he has missed an open goal here.
ConservativeHome is reporting that The Sun, through it's leader, has criticised Kelly's decision to send her child to a fee paying private school for special kids. They slam her, accusing the former Education Secretary as being a "fully fledged, ocean-going, two-faced hypocrite". Reading this on ConservativeHome was a little bit of a relief, because it finally presented me with the opportunity to see some form of Conservative outlet articulating my views.
David Cameron has distanced himself from the criticism, doubtless attempting to position himself as being warm, cuddly and representative of those who just want to do the best for their kids. It appears DC has temporarily taken leave of understanding just who he is. I am a small league politician (a local councillor) so I am totally at liberty to play the caring sharing card. I can see what Ruth Kelly's motivations are, but the simple fact of the matter is that she is part of a government that has led a concerted attack on anything outside state-funded education. They abolished the Assisted Places Scheme (which gave parents from all backgrounds the opportunity to send their kids to places like where Kelly has sent hers, without having to mortgage the house to afford the £15k a year fees) and worked tirelessly to find new ways of taxing us so they can pump billions into the State system. Mr Cameron is the leader of the opposition. He should be standing up to the government and exposing this hypocrisy, just as I would criticise my local council if they spent money on something that they had worked so hard to denigrate. It is his job!
Back to the core issue: What has all this money got us in this country? Well the cash soaked education sector is still unable to be trusted by Ms Kelly, a tantamount admission of utter failure by her government to deliver decent standards. The same is true of the NHS.
I just wish our national politicians had the guts to expose this. I desperately hope Cameron can start scoring some goals with the total shambles emanating from this government on an almost weekly basis. In my view he has missed an open goal here.
Monday, January 08, 2007
Startling new Labour hypocrisy
Over 100 special schools have been closed by this fucking awful excuse of a government. They say that their intention is to drag standards in education up to those of private and public institutions. That is why they got rid of Grammar Schools and squeezed the conditions for private fee-paying schools to such an extent as to seriously impede their ability to churn out the sort of talented scholars needed to be the next generations captain's of industry, or scientists or, heaven forbid, Labour cabinet minister.
So with this concerted assault on education, particularly for special needs pupils, it is somewhat astonishing that the former education secretary Ruth Kelly has joined the likes of Charles Faulkener and Harriet Harman in deciding to send her kids to a school she, and her government, is trying to prevent others from using. She is railing against her own ideology.
Surely if after 10 years in government the State sector is in such a depressed condition that even cabinet ministers have little faith in it the time has come to admit to their socialist failures.
So with this concerted assault on education, particularly for special needs pupils, it is somewhat astonishing that the former education secretary Ruth Kelly has joined the likes of Charles Faulkener and Harriet Harman in deciding to send her kids to a school she, and her government, is trying to prevent others from using. She is railing against her own ideology.
Surely if after 10 years in government the State sector is in such a depressed condition that even cabinet ministers have little faith in it the time has come to admit to their socialist failures.
Sunday, January 07, 2007
Saddam's toast... Iraq rejoices - part 2
Ok now he has been hung. I saw the pictures on YouTube (you know, the ones from that mobile phone which actually sees his swing) and I have heard the bleating from the likes of Prescott, Blair and Brown. They claim that the killing and manner of how Hussain was taunted before he died was 'wrong' and 'deplorable'. I disagree entirely.
I will be the first to admit that I was a little jittery about watching another human being executed, that is surely only natural. I was nonplussed about the shouting and taunts aimed at Saddam as he waited to die - I couldn't understand a word they said. I was actually rather intimidated by the rasping, gruff indignation of the dictator as he answered his critics. What I did think about, though, were the hundreds and thousands of totally innocent civilians who were gassed and summarily executed during his reign, and at his behest, for simply having a difference of opinion to him. These women and children had no trial, they enjoyed no last meal before being put to a death far crueler and much more painful than the swift compound fracture of the spinal vertabrae.
So for all those who venture opinions regarding this man's execution I would ask that you think about all those who's deaths were not subject to the rule of law and remember why this vile dictator was sentenced to death in the first place.
I will be the first to admit that I was a little jittery about watching another human being executed, that is surely only natural. I was nonplussed about the shouting and taunts aimed at Saddam as he waited to die - I couldn't understand a word they said. I was actually rather intimidated by the rasping, gruff indignation of the dictator as he answered his critics. What I did think about, though, were the hundreds and thousands of totally innocent civilians who were gassed and summarily executed during his reign, and at his behest, for simply having a difference of opinion to him. These women and children had no trial, they enjoyed no last meal before being put to a death far crueler and much more painful than the swift compound fracture of the spinal vertabrae.
So for all those who venture opinions regarding this man's execution I would ask that you think about all those who's deaths were not subject to the rule of law and remember why this vile dictator was sentenced to death in the first place.
Happy New Year
I'm back, the guys who have signed up to the website will be back and everything is all set for a very interesting 2007. I hope you all had a great Christmas and New Year break but the fight is back on with the forces of Blair-ism. Brown-ism is all set to follow but before then we have to keep slating this foul excuse of a government for the numerous failures perpetrated under Tony Blair.
I despise Labour totally. I want to see them beaten but we really need to make sure we don't have a pale imitation taking over. What will David Cameron do this year? He spent most of 2006 insulting conservatives (note the small 'c') in order to reposition the Conservatives. He lost some members to UKIP and the large pool of no party affiliation but gained thousands more. He has made us seem more appealing to those who have lost patience with Labour, but much more needs to be done.
This year several policy commissions, established by Cameron after winning the leadership contest, are due to report back. The first one of these, about tax and spending, was pretty much disregarded last year, despite having a fine small government theme running through it. If Cameron is to have any respect from the voting public he MUST take the advice of the experts chairing these commissions. That may mean tough choices, but we have got to get rid of Labour and start fixing this country and it isn't going to happen with more of the same failed liberal policies.
I despise Labour totally. I want to see them beaten but we really need to make sure we don't have a pale imitation taking over. What will David Cameron do this year? He spent most of 2006 insulting conservatives (note the small 'c') in order to reposition the Conservatives. He lost some members to UKIP and the large pool of no party affiliation but gained thousands more. He has made us seem more appealing to those who have lost patience with Labour, but much more needs to be done.
This year several policy commissions, established by Cameron after winning the leadership contest, are due to report back. The first one of these, about tax and spending, was pretty much disregarded last year, despite having a fine small government theme running through it. If Cameron is to have any respect from the voting public he MUST take the advice of the experts chairing these commissions. That may mean tough choices, but we have got to get rid of Labour and start fixing this country and it isn't going to happen with more of the same failed liberal policies.
The Tebbit Test in all it's glory
Being an English cricket fan is a tricky business right at the moment. As I write this a few thousand miles away the English cricket team has lost their grip on the Ashes they won merely 15 months earlier. The triumphs of 2005, along with the associated hysteria, has been totally thrown away after 5 Test matches of utter mediocrity from our boys down under.
But in this sea of total failure there is one ray of light giving English fans considerable heart. This player didn't make the first two Tests, despite being our leading wicket taker from the summer series in England. He is a special player and very proud to represent his country. In fact, in a magazine interview before flying off for Australia he claimed that it was the greatest honour he could be bestowed with competing for his home nation. It isn't Giles or Bell or any other English sounding 'stars'.
The outstanding finger spinner Monty Panasar has totally revolutionised the old assumptions surrounding cricketers. Before it was generally assumed they were ex public schoolboys who, more than likely, spent their junior years in all-boys schools fiddling with each other in the showers. Asian cricketers in the Bradford leagues were all Tendulkar fans, or spent their money on the green Pakistan shirts. They were British by immigration, yet asian through cricketing patronage. Many of them used the British NHS, earned a living by being employed in British firms and were educated in British schools. Yet when it came to supporting the country in sport they threw their weight behind our opponents, many actually celebrating English defeat more passionately than their own chosen team's success.
Norman Tebbit came up with one of the better known patrotism tests. He surmised that if you couldn't bring yourself to support the country which has supported you then your right to be considered British should be revoked. I have always supported this and it warms the heart to see players like Panesar and Nasser Hussain aquit themselves so spectacularly well in their cricketing endeavours. Their names may not sound English, but next to losers like Anderson or Read they are giants. If only those who owe as much to this country as Monty Panesar had his patriotic verve for this country we may not have quite so much trouble with radical Islam.
We'd still be shit at cricket though.
But in this sea of total failure there is one ray of light giving English fans considerable heart. This player didn't make the first two Tests, despite being our leading wicket taker from the summer series in England. He is a special player and very proud to represent his country. In fact, in a magazine interview before flying off for Australia he claimed that it was the greatest honour he could be bestowed with competing for his home nation. It isn't Giles or Bell or any other English sounding 'stars'.
The outstanding finger spinner Monty Panasar has totally revolutionised the old assumptions surrounding cricketers. Before it was generally assumed they were ex public schoolboys who, more than likely, spent their junior years in all-boys schools fiddling with each other in the showers. Asian cricketers in the Bradford leagues were all Tendulkar fans, or spent their money on the green Pakistan shirts. They were British by immigration, yet asian through cricketing patronage. Many of them used the British NHS, earned a living by being employed in British firms and were educated in British schools. Yet when it came to supporting the country in sport they threw their weight behind our opponents, many actually celebrating English defeat more passionately than their own chosen team's success.
Norman Tebbit came up with one of the better known patrotism tests. He surmised that if you couldn't bring yourself to support the country which has supported you then your right to be considered British should be revoked. I have always supported this and it warms the heart to see players like Panesar and Nasser Hussain aquit themselves so spectacularly well in their cricketing endeavours. Their names may not sound English, but next to losers like Anderson or Read they are giants. If only those who owe as much to this country as Monty Panesar had his patriotic verve for this country we may not have quite so much trouble with radical Islam.
We'd still be shit at cricket though.
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Ruining the Economy
The CBI has brought into the limelight the fact that public sector workers are currently paid, unjustly, 15% more than private sector workers. Ridiculous, I’m sure you would agree!
When we consider that 1 in 5 people are [unnecessarily] employed by the public sector, and that public sector pay accounts for over a quarter of all public spending, we can start to see the massive waste of our hard earned taxes.
Total spending in the 2006 Budget was £552Billion, so if we simply brought all public sector employees pay in line with the market levels, a saving of around £27.6Billion could be made.
Another result of these artificially high wages is that the best talent is being lured into the public sector and away from the jobs that can positively affect the economy in the private sector.
This Labour government is damaging the economy just as much as any previous Labour government.
The private sector could be better trusted to run many of the operations our tax is wasted on and give a better price for it too. The savings made could even plug the hole in public sector pensions (up to £1Billion) AND pay our national annual council tax bill (£22Billion)!
This is just the surface of the waste in the ‘New Labour’ system.
When we consider that 1 in 5 people are [unnecessarily] employed by the public sector, and that public sector pay accounts for over a quarter of all public spending, we can start to see the massive waste of our hard earned taxes.
Total spending in the 2006 Budget was £552Billion, so if we simply brought all public sector employees pay in line with the market levels, a saving of around £27.6Billion could be made.
Another result of these artificially high wages is that the best talent is being lured into the public sector and away from the jobs that can positively affect the economy in the private sector.
This Labour government is damaging the economy just as much as any previous Labour government.
The private sector could be better trusted to run many of the operations our tax is wasted on and give a better price for it too. The savings made could even plug the hole in public sector pensions (up to £1Billion) AND pay our national annual council tax bill (£22Billion)!
This is just the surface of the waste in the ‘New Labour’ system.
Monday, December 11, 2006
Scumbag Labour councillor exposed
I have always enjoyed reading Labour blogs. The level of intellectual reasoning is so dire that it makes me chuckle out loud! As for the sentiments expressed, well let us be frank, they are pretty inconsistent.
However, the prize for biggest twat goes to a nonety from somewhere called Sandwell. His name is Cllr Bob Piper and his drivel-full blog has been running for some time. Readers of this, far superior, website will recall the disgust I showed towards that cringeworthy YouTube contribution from Sion Simon. On this he attempts to lampoon David Cameron's 'Webcameron' site by doing some turd of an effort himself. Cue some desperate attempt to remove the offending video, not before general ridicule from everyone.
I always thought there were more total c*nts in the Labour Party so egotistical to get attention as that prick Simon, and I have been proved right!
It appears as though Cllr Piper thought a spoof of David Cameron's 'Sort It' website (another somewhat tedious effort aimed at highlighting personal debt) displayed on an annonymous blog was worthy of being published on, er, his personal blog.
The spoof shows Cameron under the 'Sort It' banner having been blacked up like a minstrel. Several speech bubbles are illustrated coming out of his mouth phrasing several comments which are very near to the knuckle and, in some cases, outright racist.
He claims that it was a joke and an attempt to highlight Cameron's apparent hypocrisy when it comes to the Tories' attempt to attract black and ethnic voters. The problem is that he is causing the Labour Party some serious headaches of their own. You must remember this. There are countless other examples of how misguided, yet largely innocent, Conservatives have been hounded out of elected office by the hysterical rantings of politically correct Labour and Lib Dem politicians eagre to make a quick political buck.
Labour are now faced with the boot being on the other foot. Will they follow their own sanctimonious lead by suspending this buffoon, or will they do the hypocritical thing and let him get away scot free?
Whatever happens it is so satisfying to see Labour reap what they sow. Political correctness has bitten them on the arse.
However, the prize for biggest twat goes to a nonety from somewhere called Sandwell. His name is Cllr Bob Piper and his drivel-full blog has been running for some time. Readers of this, far superior, website will recall the disgust I showed towards that cringeworthy YouTube contribution from Sion Simon. On this he attempts to lampoon David Cameron's 'Webcameron' site by doing some turd of an effort himself. Cue some desperate attempt to remove the offending video, not before general ridicule from everyone.
I always thought there were more total c*nts in the Labour Party so egotistical to get attention as that prick Simon, and I have been proved right!
It appears as though Cllr Piper thought a spoof of David Cameron's 'Sort It' website (another somewhat tedious effort aimed at highlighting personal debt) displayed on an annonymous blog was worthy of being published on, er, his personal blog.
The spoof shows Cameron under the 'Sort It' banner having been blacked up like a minstrel. Several speech bubbles are illustrated coming out of his mouth phrasing several comments which are very near to the knuckle and, in some cases, outright racist.
He claims that it was a joke and an attempt to highlight Cameron's apparent hypocrisy when it comes to the Tories' attempt to attract black and ethnic voters. The problem is that he is causing the Labour Party some serious headaches of their own. You must remember this. There are countless other examples of how misguided, yet largely innocent, Conservatives have been hounded out of elected office by the hysterical rantings of politically correct Labour and Lib Dem politicians eagre to make a quick political buck.
Labour are now faced with the boot being on the other foot. Will they follow their own sanctimonious lead by suspending this buffoon, or will they do the hypocritical thing and let him get away scot free?
Whatever happens it is so satisfying to see Labour reap what they sow. Political correctness has bitten them on the arse.
Thursday, December 07, 2006
Cameron is a year old today
Well, his tenure as Tory leader is. Like any one year old he is still fumbling around, trying to figure out just what this new world is all about. He had had the odd 'accident', in Cameron's case this is a load of shit photo opportunities and quite horrid incidents of vomit stained flirtings with the Grand High Witch of dumb liberalism, Polly Toynbee.
Every one year old is cooed at by people who don't really know them. Cameron is surely the same. No-one really knows what he is like of how he will turn out, they just see a fresh faced thing with pretty much a blank canvass behind him. This is all about growing up, and at one year old you have not done much of it.
The important years of growth, as anyone will tell you, is between the first and third birthday. By then there should have been some sizable diffences in perception. You should be beginning to think about crawling and then walking and you may just hear a coherant word or two.
Cameron has spent a year being cute and cuddly. People like him and the people who he is with. The BIG challenge for him now is to start growing from a blank canvass to something more substantial. Next year people should like Cameron for what he says, not what he looks like.
After being molly-coddled by PR gurus and spin doctors it is time for the real David Cameron to step forward.
Every one year old is cooed at by people who don't really know them. Cameron is surely the same. No-one really knows what he is like of how he will turn out, they just see a fresh faced thing with pretty much a blank canvass behind him. This is all about growing up, and at one year old you have not done much of it.
The important years of growth, as anyone will tell you, is between the first and third birthday. By then there should have been some sizable diffences in perception. You should be beginning to think about crawling and then walking and you may just hear a coherant word or two.
Cameron has spent a year being cute and cuddly. People like him and the people who he is with. The BIG challenge for him now is to start growing from a blank canvass to something more substantial. Next year people should like Cameron for what he says, not what he looks like.
After being molly-coddled by PR gurus and spin doctors it is time for the real David Cameron to step forward.
Friday, December 01, 2006
Religious Courts Are Wrong
I was disgusted to see on Tuesday (28th November) that the idea of religious courts and in particular Islamic courts in the UK, are going to hear more criminal cases. I was even more disgusted to see that there is a Somali court in the UK that already hears criminal cases.
May I remind the muslims (because lets be honest it usually is muslims who don’t respect other countries laws) that if you live in the UK you have to obey the law of the land not some ridiculous, sadistic, Islamic law such as the inferior sharia law!!!
Then Aydarus Yusuf who is originally from Somalia but has lived in the UK for the past 15 years had the nerve to say that he feels more bound by the law of Somalia then he does by the law of the UK. I mean who does this man think he is??? If that’s the way he feels then why doesn’t he go back and live in Somalia?
I will tell you why. It’s because our government, police force and courts are too gutless to punish a muslim when he has committed a crime. Mr Yusuf knows this and that’s why he has stayed in the UK. Also he can take advantage of our overly generous welfare system something they don’t have in Mr Yusuf’s Somalia.
Anyone who argues that these courts are needed because of multiculturalism ARE WRONG!!! Multiculturalism in the western world has failed just look at 9/11 in New York, the train bombings in Madrid and 7/7 in London. The way forward is Norman Tebbit’s ‘Cricket Test’ and assimilation.
Let’s make no mistake here. The laws of the United Kingdom are sovereign in this country and they are the ONLY laws that should be obeyed.
May I remind the muslims (because lets be honest it usually is muslims who don’t respect other countries laws) that if you live in the UK you have to obey the law of the land not some ridiculous, sadistic, Islamic law such as the inferior sharia law!!!
Then Aydarus Yusuf who is originally from Somalia but has lived in the UK for the past 15 years had the nerve to say that he feels more bound by the law of Somalia then he does by the law of the UK. I mean who does this man think he is??? If that’s the way he feels then why doesn’t he go back and live in Somalia?
I will tell you why. It’s because our government, police force and courts are too gutless to punish a muslim when he has committed a crime. Mr Yusuf knows this and that’s why he has stayed in the UK. Also he can take advantage of our overly generous welfare system something they don’t have in Mr Yusuf’s Somalia.
Anyone who argues that these courts are needed because of multiculturalism ARE WRONG!!! Multiculturalism in the western world has failed just look at 9/11 in New York, the train bombings in Madrid and 7/7 in London. The way forward is Norman Tebbit’s ‘Cricket Test’ and assimilation.
Let’s make no mistake here. The laws of the United Kingdom are sovereign in this country and they are the ONLY laws that should be obeyed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)